Skip to main content
Wissen, das wir gemeinsam aufbauen Ehrlich und transparent Von echten Menschen mit echten Daten

ahead in the Basics Check

ahead in the basics check: snacks without added sugar, polyols and blood sugar, my CGM test plan. Brand portrait.

Author: Sascha Radermacher
Professional review: pending (before publication)
Updated: 15.07.2026
Evidence: Portrait · tests pending
Snack bag with gummy bears, blood sugar curve and CGM sensor

ahead
Snacks ohne zugesetzten Zucker · Polyol-Check

Transparency notice: No paid partnership with ahead. I buy all products for the upcoming tests myself. This article is a brand portrait, not a test report.

Fact sheet

Founded 2016/2017 in Hamburg (sources cite both years) by two former German armed forces officers
Known from “Die Höhle der Löwen” (German “Dragons’ Den”) 2019 – no deal, yet strong customer growth
Range Over 170 products: gummy bears, bars, cookies, nut spreads, protein flips, zero syrups, protein powder
Core promise Snacks without added sugar
Distribution Own online shop, since 2023 also supermarkets

ahead has evolved from a supplement start-up into a snack brand. The focus is less on classic sports nutrition and more on confectionery alternatives: gummy bears, chocolate bars, spreads – all without added sugar, sweetened among other things with sweeteners, sugar substitutes and fibres such as inulin.

What is relevant for metabolism?

Snacks are the classic stumbling block on my path: the will is there, but in the evening after a call-out or a long day you reach for whatever is around. If a “nibbling alternative” really keeps blood sugar flat, that is worth a lot for the everyday viability of a dietary change plausible. The critical points:

  • Sugar substitutes (polyols): Maltitol & co. are not glucose-neutral – they act in a dampened but measurable way on blood sugar, and to differing degrees depending on the substance established. “No added sugar” does not mean “no glucose response”.
  • Tolerability: Polyols and inulin can cause bloating and diarrhoea in larger amounts established. Corresponding complaints appear occasionally in customer reviews. For me as an emergency responder this is not just a comfort question – on a night call-out I simply cannot afford gastrointestinal experiments.
  • Portion reality: Nutritional values per 100 g often look harmless; what matters is the amount actually eaten. A bag of gummy bears is emptied quickly.

Critical points I keep in mind

ahead thrives heavily on community and flavour hype. I will assess taste, but for this site it is secondary. What is decisive: how does the glucose curve behave compared to the “real” sweet – and does the difference justify the significantly higher price?

My test plan (tests pending)

  1. 1. Gummy bear duel: ahead gummy bears vs. conventional gummy bears (same amount in grams), glucose response over 3 hours, on separate days.
  2. 2. Bar as a call-out snack: tolerability and curve when the bar is eaten in the evening or after physical exertion.
  3. 3. Polyol dose test: half vs. full portion – from what point do blood sugar and digestion react noticeably?
  4. 4. Zero syrup in everyday use: on skyr/porridge, compared to the unsweetened version.

All results are labelled as single-case observation (n=1); conspicuous measurements I repeat.

This article does not replace medical advice. No product can cure a metabolic disease; what remains decisive is the overall picture of diet, exercise and medical guidance.