Skip to main content
Wissen, das wir gemeinsam aufbauen Ehrlich und transparent Von echten Menschen mit echten Daten

Manufacturers & brands: a growing, neutral overview

Here I gradually collect manufacturers and brands that play a role in the field of blood-sugar-aware, reduced-sugar nutrition. This list is a starting point and keeps growing – detailed entries for each brand will follow.

Author: Sascha RadermacherLast updated: 21 Jul 2026In progress

🌐 Translated from the German original. Wording has been localised for English readers; in case of doubt, the German version is authoritative.

What I look at neutrally in products
Neutral criteria for assessing products, without recommending or rating a brand. First, the ingredients list, short and easy to follow. Second, the type of sweeteners. Third, the nutritional values per hundred grams, especially sugar and carbohydrates. Fourth, the fibre content. This overview is for orientation, not promotion.
What I look at neutrally
Criteria for placing products – no recommendation, no rating of a brand

📋
Ingredients list
short & under-
standable?

🍯
Sweeteners
which type
is included?

📊
Nutrition /100 g
Sugar &
carbohydrates

🌾
Fibre
how much per
portion?

Fig. 1: Neutral criteria I use to place products – without recommendation or rating.

Manufacturers currently listed

Dr. Almond – low-carb and baking mixes, including for reduced-sugar baking.

Steiner Food – provider in the area of reduced-sugar / carb-conscious foods.

GenussBerlin – confectionery and snacks with a reduced-sugar focus.

Headspace – brand in the sphere of mindful nutrition and lifestyle.

Naturtreu – supplements and natural products.

NatureLove – supplements and natural products.

How I approach this list

This overview is deliberately neutral and grows over time. It isn’t meant to be a ranking or to advertise any brand, but to give orientation on which providers even exist in the field of blood-sugar-aware nutrition. Any later assessment follows the same transparent criteria – so that brands stay comparable and aren’t sorted by sympathy or advertising budget.

What I look at in a product

  • Ingredients list: short and understandable, or a long list of additives?
  • Sweetener: which type is included – and in what amount?
  • Nutrition per 100 g: above all sugar and usable carbohydrates.
  • Fibre: how much is there per portion?

These criteria say nothing about “good” or “bad” – they only help to place a product yourself, instead of relying on packaging promises. Where possible, I check concrete blood-sugar effects against my own CGM data and clearly mark them as single-case observations.

Key takeaways

  • A growing, neutral overview – not a ranking and not advertising.
  • Placed by transparent, repeatable criteria so brands stay comparable.
  • I look at: ingredients list, sweetener type, nutrition per 100 g, fibre.
  • Concrete blood-sugar effects, where checked, come from my own CGM data (n=1).